지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As the volume of international commercial transactions is increasing, the number of disputes arising therefrom is increasing as well. Nowadays the commercial arbitration is very popular means of resolution of such disputes due to the international trend favoring it. One of the main reasons is the UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (“New York Convention”) upon which the courts of a signatory country such as the US or Korea are bound to enforce foreign arbitration awards. However the Convention also permits the courts to deny the enforcement if enforcement would violate the public policy of their country.
This treatise tried to find principles and general attitudes of the US courts in dealing with the claims against the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards based upon the violation of the public policy. The author found such things and summarized the same with five subject titles including “Pro-enforcement policy” after analyzing 70 cases of the US courts including the US Supreme Court. This treatise also compared as much relevant as possible the practices of the Korean courts with those of the US courts and the statutes of the two countries in terms of the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Through the knowledge and understanding of the US courts’ holdings as to the subject of this treatise, the scholars and practitioners can get the empirical idea about the subject area. Since the US business entities are the predominant participants in the globalized commerce who are therefore the majority parties to the international arbitrations, their action to enforce the awards and the US courts experience in dealing with such enforcement will be of good help to the Korean courts, practitioners and scholars.
This treatise tried to find principles and general attitudes of the US courts in dealing with the claims against the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards based upon the violation of the public policy. The author found such things and summarized the same with five subject titles including “Pro-enforcement policy” after analyzing 70 cases of the US courts including the US Supreme Court. This treatise also compared as much relevant as possible the practices of the Korean courts with those of the US courts and the statutes of the two countries in terms of the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Through the knowledge and understanding of the US courts’ holdings as to the subject of this treatise, the scholars and practitioners can get the empirical idea about the subject area. Since the US business entities are the predominant participants in the globalized commerce who are therefore the majority parties to the international arbitrations, their action to enforce the awards and the US courts experience in dealing with such enforcement will be of good help to the Korean courts, practitioners and scholars.
#외국중재판정의 승인과 집행
#외국중재판정의 승인과 집행에 관한 국제연합 협약
#뉴욕협약
#공공질서
#공서양속
#미연방중재법
#상사중재
#상사중재판정
#국제상사중재
#국제상사중재판정
#뉴욕협약의 해석과 적용
#상사중재판정의 집행거부
#중재판정의 집행거부 사유
#Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award. Public policy. New York Convention
#Federal Arbitration Act
#Arbitration
#International Arbitration
#Resisting the enforcement of arbitral award
#Arbitrator
#Setting aside arbitration award
#Ground of interest or bias of arbitrators
#Construction and Application of United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 본론
Ⅲ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (5)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 석광현 / 2007 / 국제사법과 국제소송 제4권 / 박영사
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bergin / 1989 / The application in United States courts of the public policy provision of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards / Dick J Int'l 4 (123)
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Kuner / 1990 / The public policy exception to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in the United States and West Germany under the New York Convention / J Int'l Arb 7 (71)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Martinez / 1990 / Recognition and Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards Under the United Nations Convention of 1958: The ''Refusal'' Provisions / Int'l Law 24
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Quigley / / Accession by the United States to the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards / Yale LJ 70
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bergin / 1989 / The application in United States courts of the public policy provision of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards / Dick J Int'l 4 (123)
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Kuner / 1990 / The public policy exception to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in the United States and West Germany under the New York Convention / J Int'l Arb 7 (71)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Martinez / 1990 / Recognition and Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards Under the United Nations Convention of 1958: The ''Refusal'' Provisions / Int'l Law 24
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Quigley / / Accession by the United States to the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards / Yale LJ 70
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
우리나라 판례에 나타난 외국중재판정 집행거부사유
법학논총
2010 .02
-
국제상사 외국 중재판정의 승인 및 집행에 관한 미국의 사례 연구
무역학회지
2014 .04
-
한국에서의 외국중재판정 승인의 실제
국제사법연구
2014 .12
-
러시아에 있어서 외국 중재판정의 집행 거부에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2015 .02
-
우리나라에서 외국중재판정의 승인과 집행에 관한 고찰
중재연구
2010 .01
-
한국에서의 외국중재판정의 승인과 집행
중재연구
2007 .01
-
외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행에 관한 중국의 실행
법학연구
2019 .08
-
일본법상 외국중재판정의 승인집행 -적용법규와 승인집행거부를 중심으로-
중재연구
2010 .01
-
외국중재판정의 집행판결에서 나타난 집행거부사유에 관한 고찰
중재연구
2004 .01
-
외국중재판정의 승인 · 집행에 관한 최근 대법원 판례의 쟁점 검토 : 대법원 2017. 12. 22. 선고 2017다238837 판결을 중심으로
법학연구
2018 .12
-
PUBLIC POLICY IN ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS IN CHINESE COURTS : A PRACTICAL EVALUATION
국제거래와 법
2013 .12
-
중국 판례에 나타난 외국중재판정 집행거절사유로서의 공공질서
홍익법학
2013 .01
-
중재판정의 승인과 집행사례연구 : 우리나라 大法院判例를 中心으로
무역상무연구
2011 .02
-
U.S. Courts’ Review of Article V(1)(b) under the New York Convention for the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
중재연구
2014 .01
-
Interim Measures in Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Korea and China
중재연구
2016 .01
-
취소된 외국중재판정의 집행가능성에 관한 연구
고려법학
2010 .01
-
THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS IN KOREA
국제거래와 법
2010 .04
-
중재지인 외국에서 취소된 중재판정의 효력에 관한 고찰
중재연구
2004 .01
-
2016년 개정 중재법의 중재판정 집행에 관한 문제점
중재연구
2016 .01
-
중국에서의 중재판정의 강제집행제도상의 문제점 및 한국 측 대응방안
무역학회지
2011 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-360-002239809