메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국환경법학회 환경법연구 환경법연구 제30권 제2호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
437 - 472 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The usefulness of public participation in environmental decision-making is that it gives the parties concerned the opportunities to tell their own opinions. They can offer helpful informations to the executives and have more confidence in the decision making process and its results. Another usefulness is that it makes the public and courts review the relevant factors when the government makes records of environmental decision making. Besides, the opening of the process to the public causes the political and administrative decision-makers to consider more carefully and to deal with various problems resulted from the decisions. On the other hand, there is some skeptical views about public participation, which are attributed to the excessive expense, the chaos from a number of participants, the flood of wrong informations from ill-informed participants, the delay of exercising the policies, and so on. If the public participation process is well-planned and managed, however, its merits excel the demerits mentioned earlier. Especially, public participation is very important in that it meets the request of democratic ideology. A set of processes such as deciding the direction and goals of environmental policies, identifying their effectiveness and then reflecting it in the prospective administration, should not be operated by the executives only but be cooperated by public participation. Above all, if the administrative set up the enforcement of environmental rights as the goal of environmental administration, public participation is essentially required whether there is a provision or not. Consequently, the public and the business have to take part in the planning, making policies, managing and controlling on the environmental administration. Environmental Impact Assessment(hereinafter “EIA”) which is a effective means for predicting and assessing the environmental risks and finding ways of prior prevention and mitigation, requires for public participation. This article is aimed at reviewing EIA in U.S. and Korea comparatively, focusing on the public participation in EIA process. For this purpose, I will analyze the actual conditions of the EIA operation in both countries, such as the EIA paper writing and judicial review, and make clear the meaning of public participation by the degree of participation and its influence on environmental lawsuit. Part Ⅰ begins with the view that public participation in environmental administration should be structurally systematized because the environmental decision making has a substantial effect on the lives of the public and an ecosystem. In Part Ⅱ, I will explore the significance of public participation through reviewing the variety and methods of public participation in EIA process. Part Ⅲ deals with the details of the two countries' EIA, such as the legal basis, writing procedure, the subject and the judicial review. And then, I will compare the degree of public participation in EIA process and its influence on the environmental lawsuit. Through these comparative analysis of EIA between two countries, I will clarify the meaningfulness of public participation in EIA.
#환경영향평가 #환경영향평가서 #공적 협의 #공적 참여 #국가환경정책법 #환경질위원회 #Environmental impact assessment #Environmental impact statement #Public consultation #Public participation #National Environmental Policy Act #The Council on Environmental Quality

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청
Beierle, Thomas C / 2002 / Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions / Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press google schola Canter, L. / 1977 / Environmental Impact Assessment / New York: McGraw-Hill : 221 ~ google schola Cheremisinoff, P. / 1977 / Environmental Assessment and Impact Statement Handbook / Ann Arbor Science google schola Gaba, Jeffrey M / 2005 / 미국 환경법 / 형설출판사 google schola Haefele, Edwin T. / 1973 / Representative Government & Environmental Management, Baltimore / The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0