메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
오창규 (경남대학교) 박소진 (경남대학교) 박종필 (경남대학교) 박은주 (경남대학교)
저널정보
한국인터넷전자상거래학회 인터넷전자상거래연구 인터넷전자상거래연구 제18권 제6호
발행연도
2018.12
수록면
33 - 48 (16page)
DOI
10.37272/JIECR.2018.12.18.6.33

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The online game industry is thriving continuously due to the development of ICT-related technologies and contents. However, there is a contradictory view on online games in our society. In the positive sense that the axis of industry development through online game is positive, there is the opposite axis to regard game as evil and to be reduced. It is very important to find a consensus on the proper use of online games in a situation where both positive and negative aspects of online game using coexist. In this study, we investigated how the mechanism of online game behavior changes according to online game types and results such as winning or losing depending on the real situation. The two-way ANOVA was applied to assess the relationship between online game types (light game vs. heavy game) and online game results (win vs. lose) on online game self-control and game addiction(aggressive behaviors).The results of the study are as follows. (1) In a relatively light game, the level of self-control was statistically significantly higher. (2) There was no linear relationship between self-control and game addiction according to game types. (3) When losing in online games rather than winning status, the self-control level increased. On the other hand, when winning in online games, the addiction tendency was stronger. (4) The self-control and addiction effects of online games were found to interact with game types and game results(win vs. lose). The results of this study can be useful guidelines for verifying the fact that self control and game addiction are differ from other addiction behavior mechanisms.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구 가설
Ⅳ. 연구 설계와 실험 특성
Ⅳ. 분석 결과
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-323-000296867