지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (7)
2022
2021
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objective: The purposes of this study were to validate the accuracy of AWBA (Agricultural Whole Body Assessment) by comparing with expert"s evaluation and to suggest the improvements of AWBA based on the results of this study.
Background: In the agriculture field, many tasks could have awkward postures such as back, neck, and knee flexion according to the crops and growing processes. Many risk assessment tools such as RULA (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment), REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment), OWAS (Ovako Working posture Analysis System) have been used to quantify these awkward working postures. However, existing posture assessment tools were developed focused on the manufacturing industry, not on the agricultural tasks which require different types of working postures with the industry sites. Thus there are many limitations for applying these assessment tools to evaluate agricultural working postures. To overcome these limitations, AWBA has been developed with focusing on the agricultural tasks.
Method: The validation study of AWBA was conducted based on comparison with the expert"s evaluation results. For validation study, a total of 80 working postures were selected from pepper and bean crops. At least one representative working posture was obtained from each unit work for each crop, and the experts were asked to evaluate subjective risk levels for all 80 working postures with 4 risk levels. To compare the agreements between AWBA analyses and experts" evaluations vs. between other existing assessment tools" analyses and experts" evaluations, percent of agreement and weighted kappa analysis were applied. Based on these results, improvements of AWBA were also suggested in this study.
Results: The largest percent of agreement (44.4%) was obtained from AWBA and it is significantly larger than the percent of agreement of existing assessment tools [RULA (28.3%), REBA (37.6%), OWAS (28.6%)]. Kappa values of AWBA and REBA were 0.44 and 0.47, which means "moderate consistency" also significantly larger than results of RULA and OWAS. Results also showed that there are some difference between AWBA and expert"s evaluation at the back flexion posture (at 90°) and standing posture. Based on this, ABWA was revised and thus a revised Kappa value has been changed to 0.62 which means "substantial to almost perfect".
Conclusion: The agreement between AWBA and expert"s results was significantly higher than existing assessment tools. However some revisions were needed to improve the accuracy of AWBA. Thus, AWBA was revised based on the results of this study and the revised AWBA which was improved has been suggested.
Application: The results of this study could be applied for evaluation of agricultural working postures and may lead to improve the accuracy of risk evaluation in agricultural field. Eventually, it could improve the work environment and reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
Background: In the agriculture field, many tasks could have awkward postures such as back, neck, and knee flexion according to the crops and growing processes. Many risk assessment tools such as RULA (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment), REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment), OWAS (Ovako Working posture Analysis System) have been used to quantify these awkward working postures. However, existing posture assessment tools were developed focused on the manufacturing industry, not on the agricultural tasks which require different types of working postures with the industry sites. Thus there are many limitations for applying these assessment tools to evaluate agricultural working postures. To overcome these limitations, AWBA has been developed with focusing on the agricultural tasks.
Method: The validation study of AWBA was conducted based on comparison with the expert"s evaluation results. For validation study, a total of 80 working postures were selected from pepper and bean crops. At least one representative working posture was obtained from each unit work for each crop, and the experts were asked to evaluate subjective risk levels for all 80 working postures with 4 risk levels. To compare the agreements between AWBA analyses and experts" evaluations vs. between other existing assessment tools" analyses and experts" evaluations, percent of agreement and weighted kappa analysis were applied. Based on these results, improvements of AWBA were also suggested in this study.
Results: The largest percent of agreement (44.4%) was obtained from AWBA and it is significantly larger than the percent of agreement of existing assessment tools [RULA (28.3%), REBA (37.6%), OWAS (28.6%)]. Kappa values of AWBA and REBA were 0.44 and 0.47, which means "moderate consistency" also significantly larger than results of RULA and OWAS. Results also showed that there are some difference between AWBA and expert"s evaluation at the back flexion posture (at 90°) and standing posture. Based on this, ABWA was revised and thus a revised Kappa value has been changed to 0.62 which means "substantial to almost perfect".
Conclusion: The agreement between AWBA and expert"s results was significantly higher than existing assessment tools. However some revisions were needed to improve the accuracy of AWBA. Thus, AWBA was revised based on the results of this study and the revised AWBA which was improved has been suggested.
Application: The results of this study could be applied for evaluation of agricultural working postures and may lead to improve the accuracy of risk evaluation in agricultural field. Eventually, it could improve the work environment and reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Allen, C.E. / 1948 / Muscle action potentials used in the study of dynamic anatomy / The British Journal of Physical Medicine: including its application to industry 11 (3) : 66 ~ 73
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Andersson, E. A. / 1996 / EMG activities of the quadratus lumborum and erector spinae muscles during flexion-relaxation and other motor tasks / Clinical Biomechanics 11 (7) : 392 ~ 400
[기타자료] - Armstrong, T.J. / 1986 / Upper-extremity posture: definition, measurement and control / The Ergonomics of Working Postures : 59 ~ 73
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Blackman, N.J.M. / 2000 / Interval estimation for Cohen's kappa as a measure of agreement / Statistics in Medicine 19 (5) : 723 ~ 741
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Dickey, J. P. / 2003 / Repeated spinal flexion modulates the flexion-relaxation phenomenon / Clinical Biomechanics 18 (9) : 783 ~ 789
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Andersson, E. A. / 1996 / EMG activities of the quadratus lumborum and erector spinae muscles during flexion-relaxation and other motor tasks / Clinical Biomechanics 11 (7) : 392 ~ 400
[기타자료] - Armstrong, T.J. / 1986 / Upper-extremity posture: definition, measurement and control / The Ergonomics of Working Postures : 59 ~ 73
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Blackman, N.J.M. / 2000 / Interval estimation for Cohen's kappa as a measure of agreement / Statistics in Medicine 19 (5) : 723 ~ 741
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Dickey, J. P. / 2003 / Repeated spinal flexion modulates the flexion-relaxation phenomenon / Clinical Biomechanics 18 (9) : 783 ~ 789
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
작업 부하 고려를 통한 농작업 자세 평가도구의 수정 및 기존 도구와의 비교
대한인간공학회지
2020 .10
-
한국형 농작업자세 평가도구(Agricultural Whole Body Assessment, AWBA)의 타당성 검증 연구
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2018 .05
-
농업분야 작업환경 개선을 위한 인간공학적 연구사례(자동화 한국형 농작업자세 평가도구 개발 및 착용형 외골격의 농작업 현장 적용)
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2022 .10
-
IMU 센서 모션캡처 데이터와 이미지의 신체각도를 이용한 AWBA Checklist 평가 프로그램 개발
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2020 .10
-
농작업 기반 인간공학적 자세 분석의 자동화 자세평가와 수기 자세 평가 비교
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2022 .04
-
작업 자세 평가를 위한 AWBA 자동 평가 프로그램 개발 및 검증
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2021 .11
-
사과 선별 작업 시 적재 높이에 따른 작업자 인체 부담
대한인간공학회지
2024 .06
-
Development of a Video-Based Work Posture Assessment Assistance System
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2023 .05
-
작업 자세 부하 평가를 위한 모션 데이터 기반 자동 인간공학적 평가 프로그램 개발 및 검증
대한인간공학회지
2022 .12
-
Effectiveness of Ergonomic Intervention in Work-related Postures and Musculoskeletal Disorders of Call Center Workers: A Case-control Study
Industrial Engineering & Management Systems
2021 .06
-
소규모 토마토 시설재배 농가의 선별 작업에 대한 근골격계질환 작업부담 평가
대한인간공학회지
2023 .12
-
Working Posture Analysis of Construction Workers Using OWAS method
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2018 .05
-
환자 이승 작업자세 위험도 평가에 대한 AnyBody분석과 인간공학적 평가도구 분석과의 비교 분석
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2021 .06
-
위장조영 검사 시 투시촬영 장비를 대상으로 인간공학적 평가에 의한 작업환경 개선
대한설비관리학회지
2019 .01
-
A study on 3D human body scan posture -Focusing on core muscle strengthening posture-
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2018 .05
-
마늘 수집 작업 실태조사 및 작업 자세 근골격계 유해요인 분석
대한인간공학회지
2022 .12
-
Is standing office ergonomic?
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2016 .11
-
Customized Exercise Program based on Posture Assessment and its Related Smart Home Care System Design
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
2018 .06
-
근골격계 질환 유해요인 저감을 위한 의지 제조업체의 작업환경 개선방안 연구
대한설비관리학회지
2019 .01
-
체압특성을 이용한 수면자세 추정에 관한 연구
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『道德經』의 ‘欲’의 의미에 관한 考察
金炫秀
도교문화연구
2004
.11
작업 부하 고려를 통한 농작업 자세 평가도구의 수정 및 기존 도구와의 비교
공용구
,
최경희
,
박채원
외 3명
대한인간공학회지
2020
.10
Comparisons of ergonomics evaluation tools (AULA, RULA, REBA and OWAS) for Farm work
공용구
,
이경숙
,
최경희
외 3명
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2016
.06
작업 자세 평가를 위한 AWBA 자동 평가 프로그램 개발 및 검증
공용구
,
최경희
,
심현호
외 4명
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2021
.11
A Study on the Effect of Soft Wearable Suit Using Elastic Band
차은혜
,
오승용
,
홍철운
외 2명
Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering
2022
.01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-530-000037909