지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is of the comprehensive examination on the articles and the editorials of Zhongyangribao, the party newspaper of Guomindang(People"s party) in the Political Tutelage period, in order to clarify the situational recognition and the reactional aspects of China’s government-running media during the period of the Manchurian Incident which was the prelusion of the Sino-Japanese War. With the success of the Northern Expedition, in order to realize the Political Tutelage, Guomindang reformed Zhongyangribao, which was originally the inclination of left, and strengthen the function as its central party newspaper. By the early 1931, this newspaper could not overcome its limit of a party controled media; but the Japanese empire’s invasion of Manchuria provided a turning points to Zhongyangribao as a party newspaper. It started to propagate and expand anti-Japanese policies and dominantly produced and spreaded anti-Japanese strategies. Throughout this process Zhongyangribao rapidly grew both in quantity and in quality, and took up the core of the directly-controlled media.
In the early phase of the Manchurian Incident, Zhongyangribao domestically appealed for nationwide solidarity, prepared death for anti-Japanese volition, and criticized the invasion of Japanese empire in fierce wordings. At the same time the newspaper took the bilateral position suppressing the national independent movement of students and youths and asserting the ‘Resistance in Order’ under Guomindang’s supervision and administration. This bilaterality showed the fanciless limit of a government-running media which had to correspond to the anti-Japanese public opinion only within Nanjing government’s resolutions. Internationally, Zhongyangribao took the strategy of squeezing Japanese army’s retreat by the interference of the League of Nations; but there were not enough political·military·diplomatic abilities and efforts of Nanjing government. Yet, the economic severance against Japan turned into a notable success and became a breakthrough for exploding the nation’s resisting energy.
Since Zhongyangribao was the central party newspaper, its reports could not diverge from the nonresistant pace and its editorials were lack of practical resolution. Therefore, the influence of government-running media in the process of forming anti-Japanese public opinion was very weak. Rather, the newspaper company got attacked by the public with the critique of distorting and misleading public opinions. Zhongyangribao within the limit as a directly-controlled newspaper asserted the nonviolent long-term resistance, such as the nationwide solidarity, the resistance in order, the diplomatic interference of the League of Nations, the economic severance against Japan, and the national spiritual armament. Although it might be devaluated as a passive action under nonresistance pace, it took an important role for relieving the national critique and resistance against Guomindang’s Japan policies, and for resolving the private medias’ pressure asserting the immediate fighting.
Although Guomindang’s nonresistance pace after the Manchurian Incident hurted Nanjing government’s legitimacy, Japanese empire’s constant aggression formulated the format of the anti-Japanese war with Chiang Kai-shek in the core. Such a logic of Zhongyangribao became the strategy for anti-Japanese war not only of government-running media but also of China as a whole, and acted as the foundation for Chiang Kai-shek’s leadership. And then, as the Marco Polo Bridge Incident of 1937 enlarged the Sino-Japanese war into full-scale, the same logic became a key for the solidarity of all domestic groups to fight against Japan.
In the early phase of the Manchurian Incident, Zhongyangribao domestically appealed for nationwide solidarity, prepared death for anti-Japanese volition, and criticized the invasion of Japanese empire in fierce wordings. At the same time the newspaper took the bilateral position suppressing the national independent movement of students and youths and asserting the ‘Resistance in Order’ under Guomindang’s supervision and administration. This bilaterality showed the fanciless limit of a government-running media which had to correspond to the anti-Japanese public opinion only within Nanjing government’s resolutions. Internationally, Zhongyangribao took the strategy of squeezing Japanese army’s retreat by the interference of the League of Nations; but there were not enough political·military·diplomatic abilities and efforts of Nanjing government. Yet, the economic severance against Japan turned into a notable success and became a breakthrough for exploding the nation’s resisting energy.
Since Zhongyangribao was the central party newspaper, its reports could not diverge from the nonresistant pace and its editorials were lack of practical resolution. Therefore, the influence of government-running media in the process of forming anti-Japanese public opinion was very weak. Rather, the newspaper company got attacked by the public with the critique of distorting and misleading public opinions. Zhongyangribao within the limit as a directly-controlled newspaper asserted the nonviolent long-term resistance, such as the nationwide solidarity, the resistance in order, the diplomatic interference of the League of Nations, the economic severance against Japan, and the national spiritual armament. Although it might be devaluated as a passive action under nonresistance pace, it took an important role for relieving the national critique and resistance against Guomindang’s Japan policies, and for resolving the private medias’ pressure asserting the immediate fighting.
Although Guomindang’s nonresistance pace after the Manchurian Incident hurted Nanjing government’s legitimacy, Japanese empire’s constant aggression formulated the format of the anti-Japanese war with Chiang Kai-shek in the core. Such a logic of Zhongyangribao became the strategy for anti-Japanese war not only of government-running media but also of China as a whole, and acted as the foundation for Chiang Kai-shek’s leadership. And then, as the Marco Polo Bridge Incident of 1937 enlarged the Sino-Japanese war into full-scale, the same logic became a key for the solidarity of all domestic groups to fight against Japan.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 난징국민정부 초기 직영언론의 현황
3. 만주사변 이후 《중앙일보》의 시국인식
4. 《중앙일보》의 대일방책
5. 맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
7·7사변이후 《동아일보》의 시국인식과 전시대응
중국학보
2020 .01
-
The China Problem in Postwar Japan: Japanese National Identity and Sino-Japanese Relations.
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2015 .01
-
CLILによる異文化間コミュニケーション能力の育成の試み― 中国の大学における「日本事情」科目の目標をふまえて ―
일본어교육연구
2023 .05
-
A Study on the Korean Writing in Japanese - From an Educational Point of View of Japanese -
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2019 .07
-
Newspapers Are Dead? A Case Study on Chinese Newspapers' Public Opinion Guidance in the Context of New Media
Asian journal for public opinion research : AJPOR
2020 .01
-
토픽모델링을 활용한 국내 일본지역학 동향분석: 2000년대 이후 주요 학술지 게재논문을 중심으로
Journal of Global and Area Studies
2023 .03
-
재일동포 사회의 5·18 민주항쟁에 대한 언론 보도와 반향 고찰
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2021 .10
-
탈식민지 시대의 일본어교육 연구
일본어교육연구
2018 .01
-
제5공화국 대일외교와 한일 역사 갈등 : 1982년 일본 교과서 왜곡 사건을 사례로
일본연구논총
2019 .01
-
The Origin of Territorial Disputes in Northeast Asia and Japanese Perceptions of the Russo‐Japanese War: A Literature Review
Pacific Focus
2020 .01
-
中国における日本研究とその情報資源
일본근대학연구
2015 .01
-
청일전쟁 · 러일전쟁-한반도에서 벌어진 국제전을 바라보는 한국학계의 시각
군사
2016 .09
-
탈전후 사상의 역사성과 중층성
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2020 .10
-
在日韓国人作家の作品に見られる日本語の異化と多様化についての考察－韓国語翻訳本との比較を中心として－
일본언어문화
2016 .01
-
1930년대 일본 소년만화잡지에 나타난 ‘滿洲夢’
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2020 .07
-
제1차 상하이사변 시기 일본인거류민사회 토착파 연구
중국학보
2024 .02
-
中国大学の日本語人材育成- 専門能力と学術能力-
일본어교육연구
2020 .01
-
<조선시보> 연구의 필요성 : 경상남도물산공진회 관련 기사를 중심으로
동북아 문화연구
2017 .03
-
일본 신약성경의 漢語動詞 사용양상
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2018 .10
-
｢言語スキル｣向上が目的の教科における日本語 イマージョン教育の役割と教育条件
일본언어문화
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국전쟁 시기 중국인민지원군 · 연변(延邊) 조선인 사회의 ‘후방지원’ 활동과 북중 ‘혈맹’관계의 강화
문미라
동북아역사논총
2017
.09
1945~1947년 북 · 중관계의 형성과 북 · 중혈맹의 근원
김선호
동북아역사논총
2017
.09
중국공산당 통치의 정당성과 ‘유교중국’의 재구축-1 : 유교의 ‘통치이념화’와 20세기 역사경험의 문제
조경란
철학
2017
.08
1940년 전후 동북항일연군 · 조선의용군의 변화와 중국 · 소련 관계
김선호
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2017
.06
한국의 삼대(三代), 그리고 자본주의
백지홍
더원미술세계
2017
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-390-001240899