지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, we examine the Rules of Origin (ROOs) in Korea’s existing FTAs and explore the ROO-related issues in terms of the use of FTAs by analyzing the results of firm survey conducted by Gallup Korea.
First of all, this paper addresses growing concerns regarding the complexity and inconsistency imposed by the ROOs in Korea’s existing FTAs. By examining the ROOs in seven FTAs, which Korea has concluded or entered into force, we find out diversity across FTAs. Such diversity creates inconsistency in Korea’s FTA rules of origin, which implies that local firms have to follow different criteria to meet originating status across FTAs. That is, the operational complications stemming from different ROOs lead to higher compliance costs for local firms, which are likely to exceed benefits from FTA preferences. Therefore, firms may eventually give up on the use of FTA preferences.
In this respect, this study emphasizes the importance of building Korea’s own position on the ROOs and applying them to the remaining FTAs. It would help Korea to maintain consistency of its ROOs in future FTAs, which leads to reap full benefits of the multiple FTAs. In building Korea’s position on FTA rules of origin, emphasis is placed on to provide supportive system for firms to acquire proper and practical information about the FTAs, to maintain consistency vis-a-vis ROOs in the existing FTAs, and to improve the domestic regime related to the ROOs.
First of all, this paper addresses growing concerns regarding the complexity and inconsistency imposed by the ROOs in Korea’s existing FTAs. By examining the ROOs in seven FTAs, which Korea has concluded or entered into force, we find out diversity across FTAs. Such diversity creates inconsistency in Korea’s FTA rules of origin, which implies that local firms have to follow different criteria to meet originating status across FTAs. That is, the operational complications stemming from different ROOs lead to higher compliance costs for local firms, which are likely to exceed benefits from FTA preferences. Therefore, firms may eventually give up on the use of FTA preferences.
In this respect, this study emphasizes the importance of building Korea’s own position on the ROOs and applying them to the remaining FTAs. It would help Korea to maintain consistency of its ROOs in future FTAs, which leads to reap full benefits of the multiple FTAs. In building Korea’s position on FTA rules of origin, emphasis is placed on to provide supportive system for firms to acquire proper and practical information about the FTAs, to maintain consistency vis-a-vis ROOs in the existing FTAs, and to improve the domestic regime related to the ROOs.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 한국의 FTA 원산지규정 현황 비교 및 문제점
Ⅲ. 국내기업의 FTA 활용 현황 분석
Ⅳ. 결론 및 정책적 제언
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
1. [보고서] - 김한성 / 2008 / 한국 특혜원산지규정의 특성 및 활용전략
2. [보고서] - 김한성 / 2009 / 한·ASEAN FTA 효율적 이행을 위한 연구: 상품 무역을 중심으로
4. [보고서] - 조미진 / 2010 / 동아시아 FTA를 대비한 한국 원산지규정 추진 방안
6. [보고서] - Cadot, O / 2006 / Product Specific Rules of Origin in EU and US Preferential Trading Arrangements: An Assessment
7. [단행본] - Cadot, O / 2002 / Assessing the Effect of NAFTA's Rules of Origin / mimeo
2. [보고서] - 김한성 / 2009 / 한·ASEAN FTA 효율적 이행을 위한 연구: 상품 무역을 중심으로
4. [보고서] - 조미진 / 2010 / 동아시아 FTA를 대비한 한국 원산지규정 추진 방안
6. [보고서] - Cadot, O / 2006 / Product Specific Rules of Origin in EU and US Preferential Trading Arrangements: An Assessment
7. [단행본] - Cadot, O / 2002 / Assessing the Effect of NAFTA's Rules of Origin / mimeo
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-326-000658217