지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It was a widely-held view until now that Wang Kun had the leading role, with Gungye and Taebong regime as its supporting role, in terms of understanding the naval activities of Naju. However, after reinterpreting the related materials, it seems that Naju operation was planned and executed as a military and strategic reflection under the comprehensive political framework of Taebong regime. It is inferred that the operation was predominantly carried out by two central figures. Gungye acted as the ultimate decision-maker, and Wang Kun has set up strategies and took charge of military activities.
New perspective can also be introduced in respect to the general theory that Naju domination was possible on the basis of solidarity between Wang Kun and the powerful families of Naju. Formerly it was believed that Taebong conquest of Naju was done peacefully with the cooperation of powerful clans, but the fact is that they surrendered as a result of several military campaigns of Gungye's kingdom. Especially, the victory of Taebong navy at the sea-battle of Dukjinpo in 912 served as its decisive momentum.
In short, it can be said that Naju submission was generated through the military operation of Taebong navy, and that solidarity with Wang Kun also was gradually formulated as a product of Taebong's constant expeditions. Moreover, it is understood that as Taebong strived to mobilize its navy to conquer and dominate sea power, Naju eventually became a region of Taebong and soon emerged as the strategic headquarter of unification wars.
New perspective can also be introduced in respect to the general theory that Naju domination was possible on the basis of solidarity between Wang Kun and the powerful families of Naju. Formerly it was believed that Taebong conquest of Naju was done peacefully with the cooperation of powerful clans, but the fact is that they surrendered as a result of several military campaigns of Gungye's kingdom. Especially, the victory of Taebong navy at the sea-battle of Dukjinpo in 912 served as its decisive momentum.
In short, it can be said that Naju submission was generated through the military operation of Taebong navy, and that solidarity with Wang Kun also was gradually formulated as a product of Taebong's constant expeditions. Moreover, it is understood that as Taebong strived to mobilize its navy to conquer and dominate sea power, Naju eventually became a region of Taebong and soon emerged as the strategic headquarter of unification wars.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 『고려사』 관련 기록의 기초적 이해
Ⅲ. 왕건의 수군활동과 태봉ㆍ궁예
Ⅳ. 태봉의 나주진출과 왕건ㆍ나주호족
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (52)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
태봉의 수군전략과 수군운용
역사와경계
2010 .06
-
후삼국시대 나주지역의 해양전략적 가치
도서문화
2011 .12
-
고려시대 ‘해항도시’ 나주에 관한 시론
해항도시문화교섭학
2018 .10
-
조선 성종 태봉(胎峰)의 풍수지리적 특징 비교 : 초장지와 이장지를 중심으로
한국학연구
2010 .06
-
太祖王建이 나주 공략과 압해도 능창 제압
도서문화
2008 .12
-
1930년대 羅州 榮山江 유역의 농업변동 ― 多侍水利組合 區域을 중심으로
대동문화연구
2003 .01
-
16~17세기 羅州羅氏 一門의 활동과 그 의미
역사학연구
2019 .01
-
궁예정권의 철원 천도와 전쟁사적 의미
한국사연구
2012 .09
-
‘궁예미륵’ 석불입상의 구비전승적 연구 : 안성 기솔리 석불입상, 포천 구읍리 석불입상을 중심으로
민속학연구
2012 .06
-
朝鮮後期 羅州諸島의 折受와 設邑論議의 展開
대동문화연구
2005 .01
-
나주 철천리 석불입상의 조성시기와 배경
신라사학보
2014 .08
-
조선시대 나주 지방 이서의 조직과 담당 가계
담론201
2005 .01
-
고려의 수군전략과 후삼국통일
동방학지
2012 .01
-
나주 차문화에 대한 고찰
차문화산업학
2019 .01
-
궁예와 고려 태조의 농민정책에 대한 재검토
신라사학보
2019 .12
-
왕건과 전남 세력의 동향 – 나총례, 오다련, 최지몽을 중심으로 -
도서문화
2018 .12
-
후삼국시대사론
신라사학보
2016 .08
-
전설에 나타난 궁예왕
인문과학연구
2006 .06
-
나말려초 중부지역 석불조각에 대한 고찰 -궁예 태봉(901~918)지역 미술에 대한 시고-
역사와현실
2002 .06
-
康津 無爲寺 先覺大師碑를 통해 본 弓裔 행적의 재검토
목간과문자
2011 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-003771810