메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
서만덕 (한국해양과학기술원)
저널정보
한국기후변화학회 한국기후변화학회지 Journal of Climate Change Research Vol.15 No.6
발행연도
2024.12
수록면
1,073 - 1,083 (11page)
DOI
10.15531/KSCCR.2024.15.6.1073

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study conducted network analysis of 43,393 climate change-related articles published in SCIE from 1984 to 2023 to analyze the structures of research collaborations and assess the impacts of these collaborations on the quality of research. The United States plays a central role in climate change research, with countries such as the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, and China also making important contributions to the research collaboration network. Key hubs of institutional collaboration include the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the University of California, France’s Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), and the Helmholtz Association, all of which display high network centrality. Institutional collaboration structures are characterized by a mix of global and national clusters, with global clusters dominated by institutions in Germany, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Spain, and the United States, while national clusters are predominant in high productivity countries such as the United States, France, China, and Australia. Multinational and multi-institutional collaborations also outperformed single-country and single-institution research across all scales of research impact. In particular, multinational research collaborations show Category Normalized Citation Impact (CNCI) scores that are approximately 30% higher, while Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is around 35% higher than single-country research. Furthermore, increases in the number of collaborating countries and institutions tend to result in higher research impact. This finding suggests that the diversity of countries and institutions involved in a study contributes positively to the quality of the research.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 방법론
3. 분석결과
4. 결론 및 고찰
Reference

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092197959