메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정주희 (광주기후에너지진흥원) 오병철 (광주기후에너지진흥원)
저널정보
한국기후변화학회 한국기후변화학회지 Journal of Climate Change Research Vol.14 No.5
발행연도
2023.10
수록면
587 - 598 (12page)
DOI
10.15531/ksccr.2023.14.5.587

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As climate change intensifies, the intensity of heatwaves and their threats to human health are correspondingly increasing. Issuing heatwave warnings is considered a basic measure in mitigating harm. This study focused on the fact that, to enhance the effectiveness of these warnings, the cognitive perspective of heatwaves and the standards for special warnings must be similar. A total of 180 samples were analyzed, taking into account variables such as Thermal Sensational Vote (TSV), Thermal Comfort Vote (TCV), Apparent Temperature (AT), and Heat Intensity (HIn), which are items based on an individual"s cognitive perspective. The survey was analyzed in two phases. Simple regression analysis revealed significant associations among three variables (TSV, AT, and HIn) when temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH) were employed as sole independent variables. However, multiple regression analysis identified only T as a significant variable. In the case of TCV, T was significant in simple regression analysis, but RH was not. In multiple regression analysis, however, both T and RH were found to be significant. These findings underscore the importance of aligning public perception, as captured by sensation variables, with the scientific metrics describing thermal indices. This alignment is pivotal to ensuring that heatwave warnings effectively safeguard communities by being both scientifically accurate and intuitively comprehensible. This research is expected to serve as a foundation for future studies aimed at refining heatwave warning systems.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경 및 선행연구
3. 연구방법
4. 연구 결과 및 논의
5. 결론
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0