지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose - The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) among 16 countries including South Korea, the largest free trade agreement in the Asia-Pacific region, will be concluded next year. The participating countries decided to pursue a comprehensive and high ?quality agreement, while ensuring flexibility considering development level of each country. In this study, trade structures between nations from 2005 through 2016 were examined to see the impact that this agreement will have on Korea and to come up with effective countermeasures.
Research design, data, and methodology - The method of analysis includes the analysis of the trade matrix, which is useful for identifying the dependency of the individual countries on the market in the region and the reciprocal dependency of the member countries on the market, and the index of intensity of trade, which is useful for figuring out the share of trade between the parties in total trade.
Results - The results showed that first, the international trade coefficients of Vietnam and Philippines are higher than those of China and Japan. Secondly, the international inducement coefficients between China and Japan were high, and that between Indonesia and Burma were low, indicating that Korea's exports did not have much effect on export increase of these countries. Third, as a result of analyzing Korea's trade intensity, it was found that export intensity and import intensity were greater than 1 in Vietnam and Philippines, which shows that there is a high degree of relational bond with these countries. India and Laos countries still have a low level of relational bond, which indicates that there is room for improvement in economic relations when the agreement is concluded. After the signing of the agreement in the future, more diverse industrial structures should be continuously studied.
Conclusions - The analysis of trade matrix, trade structure, trade inducement coefficient and trade intensity between Korea and RCEP participating countries shows that the majority of the countries have the high level of economic relationship with Korea. Korea should drive a harder bargain when negotiating the terms of the RCEP, in comparison with the level of the existing FTA agreement excluding Japan.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
정인교 / 2013 / The Evaluation of East Asian Regionalism from APEC to RCEP / Journal of International Logistics and Trade 11(1):99~112
Chen, Y. J. / 2016 / Asia Pacific Regional Economic Integration : Competition vs. Conflict / Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations : An International Journal 2(1):141~171
Chiang, M. H. / 2013 / The Potential of China-Japan-South Korea Free Trade Agreement / East Asia : An International Quarterly 30(3):199~216
정재완 / 2017 / 주요 수출입물품에 대한 RECP에서의 합리적 PSR에대한 연구 / 관세학회지 18(3):57~82
Devadason, E. S. / 2015 / Framing China-Malaysia Trade Relations Beyond ASEAN : Factoring The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership / The Journal of Developing Areas 49(2):39~56
Chen, Y. J. / 2016 / Asia Pacific Regional Economic Integration : Competition vs. Conflict / Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations : An International Journal 2(1):141~171
Chiang, M. H. / 2013 / The Potential of China-Japan-South Korea Free Trade Agreement / East Asia : An International Quarterly 30(3):199~216
정재완 / 2017 / 주요 수출입물품에 대한 RECP에서의 합리적 PSR에대한 연구 / 관세학회지 18(3):57~82
Devadason, E. S. / 2015 / Framing China-Malaysia Trade Relations Beyond ASEAN : Factoring The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership / The Journal of Developing Areas 49(2):39~56
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Intra-regional trade and production network of the RCEP participating countries
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2017 .07
-
Potential Implications of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership to India-South Korea Bilateral Trade Ties
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2020 .01
-
RCEP 국가의 글로벌 생산네트워크 교역에서 무역원활화의 역할에 대한 분석
무역연구
2019 .01
-
RCEP 다자누적 활용 가능성 : 제조업 투자 및 원부자재 교역동향을 중심으로
관세학회지
2020 .08
-
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP): Progress and Challenges
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2017 .06
-
A Study on the Impact of RCEP Tariff Reduction on Korea’s Agricultural Trade: Simulation Analysis Based on the GTAP Model
무역연구
2022 .02
-
RCEP 발효에 따른 한국 무역에 미치는 영향과 대응방안에 대한 연구
관세학회지
2022 .05
-
역내포괄적경제동반자협정(RCEP) 체결에 따른 한국의 회원국들 간 대외교역효과분석
무역연구
2017 .01
-
韩中自贸区背景下的贸易效应研究－基于引力模型的模拟－
Journal of China Studies
2021 .01
-
아·태지역 디지털 무역 관련 지역무역협정을 통한 규범화 발전 동향과 평가
무역학회지
2021 .08
-
A Study on the Determinants of Free Trade Agreement in South Korea: Evidence from Asian Countries
유통과학연구
2018 .01
-
Estimating the Economic Impact of Digital Trade Agreement
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2024 .07
-
RCEP의 원산지 규정의 특성과 적용
무역연구
2023 .04
-
RCEP 직접운송원칙을 활용한 우리나라의 FTA 물류 허브 가능성과 경제적 효과
무역학회지
2021 .06
-
제주특별자치도 주요 품목의 RCEP 원산지규정에 관한 시사점 : 수산물과 과수작물의 비교를 중심으로
해양비즈니스
2022 .12
-
Trade Structure Analysis in the Auto Distribution Industry between Korea and the U.S
유통과학연구
2015 .01
-
디지털무역 자유화를 위한 지역무역협정의 성과와 과제
무역연구
2019 .01
-
The Future of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in the Asia Pacific Region and Major Economies’ Strategies for the Regional Economic Integration
JOURNAL OF APEC STUDIES
2021 .12
-
RCEP vs. TPP : Which One Would Be More Beneficial to Korea Economically?
무역연구
2015 .01
-
RCEP 참여국의 역내 무역 및 후방참여 연계성 분석
무역학회지
2021 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0