메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
양영희 (전남대학교)
저널정보
한국문법교육학회 문법교육 문법 교육 제44권
발행연도
2022.4
수록면
185 - 224 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to contribute to the re-education training course by identifying the educational needs of Korean teachers. Educational needs based on the teachers view of the demand for the difference between the current level(what is) and the target level(what should be) were identified through the gap between the teachers recognition of the importance of a specific educational area and the level of class execution. In-depth interviews and surveys were analyzed using ‘The Locus for Focus model’ and ‘Borich needs’, and the following results were derived. The demand for speaking and listening education was high in ‘university’ and teacher group ‘visiting public educational institutions’, and writing education was high in ‘university-affiliated institutions’ and in-service teacher group in public educational institutions. The demand for vocabulary education was high among the teachers in the ‘Multicultural Family Support Center’ and the ‘Foreign Workers Support Center’. And the demand for reading education was high in the teachers of institutions designated for the Korea Immigrants and Integration Program. It is interpreted that Korean language teachers in the academic purpose group have high demands for speaking, listening, and writing education, while teachers in the living purpose group are for vocabulary education. These results are meaningful because they confirm the differences by field. This distinction is also observed in the difference in preference for educational content in the same area. In other words, even within the group that requested speaking and listening, universities prefer discussion and teacher group visiting public educational institutions prefer presentation along with discussion. The survey found that teachers at university-affiliated institutions where requested writing education preferred the feedback method, but the public education teachers equally preferred the method of writing a report including feedback, writing an explanatory text, etc. The above results suggest that the current National Institute of the Korean Language, which operates teachers re-education course by field, is reasonable, but it is necessary to consider that there is a difference in the needs and contents of education for each field.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0