지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to develop the Meta-Evaluation Criteria which can comprehensively and systematically evaluate and improve the Accreditation Evaluation System for Engineering Education. This will provide useful implications for establishing value, direction, and improvement remedy for Engineering Educations Accreditation System of Korea. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, Meta-Evaluation Criteria was developed to comprehensively and systematically assess and analyze the Accreditation Evaluation System of Engineering Education. The research methodology used to study these subjects: literature review, interviews with experts, Delphi survey (three times), survey, analysis of narrative opinion and secondary source. The results and conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows: First, the final Meta-Evaluation Criteria were developed so as to comprehensively and systematically assess and analyze the Accreditation Evaluation System of Engineering Education. The criteria’s validity and reliability were also identified. Specific details are as follows: In a draft plan of the Meta-Evaluation Criteria, Meta-Evaluation concept was defined as evaluation on the whole range of Accreditation Evaluation System of Engineering Education. Meta-Evaluation Criteria was designed to be based on a systematic approach and applies the phased approach to the lower component to reflect evaluation’s characteristics. Then validity and reliability of the developed draft plan was verified by calculating Content Validity Ratio(CVR), Degree of Consensus, Degree of Convergence and Cronbach’s alpha. The final developed Meta-Evaluation Criteria obtaining validity and reliability were composed of 5 evaluation areas (environment, input, performance, result, utilization), 15 evaluation items, 68 evaluation indicators.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (49)
참고문헌 신청
Chelimsky, E. / 1985 / Program Evaluation: Patterns and Directions / The American Society for Public Administration
Cook, T. D. / 1978 / Metaevaluation research / Evaluation Quarterly 2 : 5 ~ 51
Dalkey, N. C. / 1969 / An experimental study of group opinion / RAND Co
Delbecq, A. L. / 1975 / Group techniques for programme planning: A guide to nominal group and delphi processes / The Scott, Foresman and Company
Hsu, C / 2007 / The delphi technique: Making sense of consensus / Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 12 (10) : 1 ~ 8
Cook, T. D. / 1978 / Metaevaluation research / Evaluation Quarterly 2 : 5 ~ 51
Dalkey, N. C. / 1969 / An experimental study of group opinion / RAND Co
Delbecq, A. L. / 1975 / Group techniques for programme planning: A guide to nominal group and delphi processes / The Scott, Foresman and Company
Hsu, C / 2007 / The delphi technique: Making sense of consensus / Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 12 (10) : 1 ~ 8
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0