메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국로렌스학회 D. H. 로렌스 연구 D. H. 로렌스 연구 제23권 제2호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
25 - 48 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Gilles Deleuze often mentions D. H. Lawrence as his great precursor, especially when discussing American literature. In such essays as “On the Superiority of Anglo-American Literature” and “Bartleby; or, The Formula” he makes it apparent that Lawrence’s Studies in Classic American Literature has been his main source of inspiration in rethinking American literature. It remains, however, an important critical task to scrutinize how much common ground Lawrence and Deleuze have, or, in reverse, how serious their differences are when they talk about American literature, particularly Herman Melville’s works. This paper argues that these differences are significant, and reverberate throughout the whole itinerary of their “thought adventure.” It involves a comparative study of their essays on Melville and their basic concepts on American history and literature: Lawrence’s “escaped slaves” and “spirit of place” and Deleuze’s “line of flight” and “becoming.” The paper presents first, Deleuze’s view on Typee, though largely relying on Lawrence’s, diverge from the latter in deleting the part of the narrator Tommo’s getting away from the savages. Second, Lawrence views the “escaped slaves” as an indispensable concept in understanding American history, whereas there is nothing comparable in Deleuze. Third, their differences will be further revealed when imagining what Lawrence would say about Deleuze’s essay on “Bartleby, the Scrivener” and comparing their interpretations of Moby-Dick, focusing on the character of Ahab.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0