지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the East Coast of Gangwon-do, there are valley encircling fortresses on the flatland sites that taken advantage of the natural mountain ridges as ramparts. Mostly the geographical features of mountains (north high and south low), and the east, southeast and south of the mountain fortresses lead to flatland, they had served as the entrance. And there used to be a river flowing in front and a farmland.
Based on the folk materials regarding these mountain fortress, which have been handed down to us, many believe that they were constructed in the age of Yeguk (the Iron Age), the age of Three Kingdoms and the Unified Shilla period. But the researcher classified these types of mountain fortresses, and analyzed archeological materials and folk materials, and came to the conclusion that these mountain fortress cannot date back to the age of Yeguk (the Iron Age) and the age of Three Kingdoms.
The researcher believes that only very few of these mountain fortresses were utilized in the Unified Shilla period, and most mountain fortresses were constructed and utilizeed during the Goryo Dynasty, and many of them were built and used at the end of the Goryo Dynasty and in the early Joseon Dynasty period. In this respect, caution must be exercised when these fortresses are used as base data for historical interpretation.
The nature of these fortresses varies depending on their sizes, but as the mountain fortresses have a wells, people could live and seek protection in them, and as there are roof tiles, these mountain fortress may be related to the ruling class. In some mountain fortress, roof tiles bearing the name of the ‘official residence’ were excavated, and as the origins of names of places like ‘Jangan (seong),’ ‘Manho’ and ‘Jinjang’ have been handed down to us, they may be related to Chiso-seong (eup-seong and hyeon-seong), but most of them were controlled by them, or they can be seen as the administrative and military strongholds (villages) of local indigenous forces in charge of managing these fortresses.
Furthermore, as some fortresses are located on the seashore, they are seen to have plated the role of non-regular marine transportation and ocean transportation bases on the East Coast, and the reason that these fortresses have a river flowing nearby may be related to transportation of goods.
Based on the folk materials regarding these mountain fortress, which have been handed down to us, many believe that they were constructed in the age of Yeguk (the Iron Age), the age of Three Kingdoms and the Unified Shilla period. But the researcher classified these types of mountain fortresses, and analyzed archeological materials and folk materials, and came to the conclusion that these mountain fortress cannot date back to the age of Yeguk (the Iron Age) and the age of Three Kingdoms.
The researcher believes that only very few of these mountain fortresses were utilized in the Unified Shilla period, and most mountain fortresses were constructed and utilizeed during the Goryo Dynasty, and many of them were built and used at the end of the Goryo Dynasty and in the early Joseon Dynasty period. In this respect, caution must be exercised when these fortresses are used as base data for historical interpretation.
The nature of these fortresses varies depending on their sizes, but as the mountain fortresses have a wells, people could live and seek protection in them, and as there are roof tiles, these mountain fortress may be related to the ruling class. In some mountain fortress, roof tiles bearing the name of the ‘official residence’ were excavated, and as the origins of names of places like ‘Jangan (seong),’ ‘Manho’ and ‘Jinjang’ have been handed down to us, they may be related to Chiso-seong (eup-seong and hyeon-seong), but most of them were controlled by them, or they can be seen as the administrative and military strongholds (villages) of local indigenous forces in charge of managing these fortresses.
Furthermore, as some fortresses are located on the seashore, they are seen to have plated the role of non-regular marine transportation and ocean transportation bases on the East Coast, and the reason that these fortresses have a river flowing nearby may be related to transportation of goods.
#평지포곡식산성
#동계
#관사
#장안(성)
#만호
#진장
#치소성
#지방토착세력의 행정적 군사적 거점
#조운과 해운의 거점
#Valley encircling fortress on the flatland site
#eastern border region
#official residence
#Jangan (fortress)
#Manho
#Jinjang
#Chiso-seong
#administrative and military stronghold (base village
#fortress for residence) the local indigenous forces
#marine transportation and ocean transportation base
목차
1. 머리말
2. 강원도 동해안 지역의 평지 포곡식 산성 조사
3. 축조시기와 성격 분석
4. 맺음말
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (89)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
북한산의 역사 유적과 발굴 현황 -북한산성과 탕춘대성을 중심으로-
한국학논총
2024 .02
-
7세기 초 삼국의 정세와 당항성 전투 의의
군사
2015 .09
-
나(羅)·당(唐) 군의 이동과 백제군 배비 - 서기 660년 -
군사학연구
2016 .01
-
羅唐戰爭期 七重城과 買肖城 戰鬪 - 買肖城의 位置 比定 및 靺鞨 水軍의 活動에 대한 分析을 中心으로 -
군사
2021 .03
-
임진강유역 신라 성곽의 축성변화 고찰
군사
2024 .09
-
‘나․제동맹기’ 신라와 백제의 국경선 변천
한국학논총
2016 .01
-
고려 태조 왕건의 삼년산성전투, 그 배경과 전개과정 검토
군사
2020 .09
-
조선시대 제주도 진성(鎭城)에 대한 인문 지리학적 고찰 -특히 사적(史蹟) 지정 필요성과 관련하여-
경관과 지리
2021 .01
-
문화유산을 활용한 중학생 지리 답사 프로그램 개발 - 공주 공산성을 대상으로 -
한국지역지리학회지
2024 .08
-
국가기본도의 산 지명에 관한 연구: 강원도를 사례로
한국지리학회지
2021 .12
-
빅데이터 분석을 활용한 수원화성 관광 현황 연구 : 연도별 주요 키워드를 중심으로
관광연구저널
2019 .07
-
전라남도의 산 정보와 지명에 관한 연구
경관과 지리
2022 .03
-
Putin, Ruler with a Fortress Mentality : The Code of Putinism By Brian D. Taylor
Global Asia
2018 .09
-
서울과 북한산의 역사와 가치
한국학논총
2024 .02
-
역사문화환경으로서 서울 풍납동 토성 일대의 도시형태 특성 연구
서울학연구
2016 .02
-
임진왜란기 경상좌도 지역 청도군수의 임용실태와 전쟁대응
한국학논총
2018 .01
-
CVM을 활용한 역사관광자원의 입장료 지불가치 추정 : 수원화성을 중심으로
지방정부연구
2016 .08
-
미래 산악관광 연구 방향에 관한 탐색적 연구
융합관광콘텐츠연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-390-000788341