메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
연구보고서
저자정보
김상일 (도시공간연구실) 허자연 (도시공간연구실)
저널정보
서울연구원 서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서 [서울연 2015-PR-42] 서울시 상업 젠트리피케이션 실태와 정책적 쟁점
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
1 - 145 (145page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There are growing concerns about negative effects of commercial gentrification in Seoul. This study explores the issues and alternatives through field survey, data analysis, interviews and surveys of shop owners, landlords and residents, to understand necessity and directions of government intervention in gentrification. Studies are mainly limited in Gyeongridan-gi, Yeonnam-dong, and a part of Seochon and Donggyo-dong, which have not only new in-comer stores, but also old stroes. Increasing attention of media and the number of real estate transactions, and soaring rent are commonly observed in these areas.
Landlords have shown superior status in commercial building lease transactions, causing imbalance between supply and demand of store spaces. Using this authority, some landlords require higher rent, make tenants implement landlords’ duties, such as building repairs and payment of the licensing costs for changing building use, and even interrupt transactions of premiums. Paying such a high rent limits business types and it makes similar business types intensively concentrated. Competition among similar business causes zero-sum game, reducing benefits of stores.
Gentrification in residential areas destroys authentic residential environments with traffic, parking problems, noises, trash and displacement of neighborhood retail shops. The famous street filled with transport cafes, over thirty years of tradition, is deteriorated and now replace by fancy restaurants, cafes and pubs for tourists.
To prevent these negative effects of commercial gentrification, counter-measures against balloon effects into neighboring area have to be prepared. Also administrative procedures have to be simplified for political timeliness and institutional strategies are needed to encourage landlords’ participation. By disclosing information of commercial building transactions, unfair contracts by informational asymmetry could be prevented.
A current law for protection of commercial building tenants cannot guarantee withdrawing profits worth prior investment and sunk cost of tenants, so improvement of some provisions of the law would be needed. However, local economic conditions and local characteristics are too different to adopt same provisions according to regions. Therefore it is more reasonable that local government decide their own limits of rent contract period, rent rising ratio, and business types. To prevent excessive commercialization in residential area, which are approved by the current zoning system, district unit plan including controlling business types and sizes have to be provided.

목차

[표지]
[요약]
[목차]

그림
[요약]
[01 연구개요]
1_배경 및 목적
2_내용 및 방법
[02 상업가로에서의 젠트리피케이션]
1_젠트리피케이션의 이론적 논의
2_상업 젠트리피케이션의 주체와 특징
3_서울시 상업 젠트리피케이션의 배경
[03 서울시의 상업 젠트리피케이션 사례]
1_경리단길 사례
2_연남동 사례
3_소결
[04 서울시의 상업 젠트리피케이션에 관한 쟁점들]
1_일부 건물주의 부당한 행태
2_상점 간의 출혈경쟁과 매출 부진
3_지역 고유성의 상실
[05 젠트리피케이션에 대한 정책개입 방향]
1_정책개입의 기본방향
2_선제적 대응을 위한 검토 시안
3_서울시 젠트리피케이션 종합대책 추진 시 고려사항
[06 결론]
1_서울시 젠트리피케이션의 실태와 주요 쟁점
2_상업 젠트리피케이션에 대한 정책개입 방향
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[Abstract]
Contents

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-359-001538146