메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이래혁 (순천향대학교) 이재경 (창신대학교)
저널정보
한국보건교육건강증진학회 보건교육건강증진학회지 보건교육건강증진학회지 제34권 제2호
발행연도
2017.6
수록면
29 - 40 (12page)
DOI
10.14367/kjhep.2017.34.2.29

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objectives: This study aimed to examine the association between experiencing food insecurity and suicidal ideation among low-income households in South Korea, with particular attention to investigating the mediating roles of depression and health satisfaction. Methods: This study used a nationally representative sample from three recent waves of the Korean Welfare Panel Study. The analytic sample of this study was composed of 2,078 low-income households. This study conducted a path analysis to estimate the path model representing the hypothesized set of associations. Results: Overall, this study found that experiencing food insecurity was directly associated with a higher likelihood of having suicidal ideation, with a higher level of depression, and with a lower level of health satisfaction. This study also found partial mediation paths in which food insecurity was associated with suicidal ideation through depression, and food insecurity was associated with depression through health satisfaction; and a full mediation path in which health satisfaction was associated with suicidal ideation through depression. Furthermore, this study found that the direct association of experiencing food insecurity with having suicidal ideation was more pronounced for male-headed households, and that the indirect associations between food insecurity, health satisfaction, depression, and suicidal ideation were more pronounced for non-elderly-headed households. Conclusions: Policy and practice implications to improve living condition among low-income households and to reduce their suicide-related behavior were discussed.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
References

참고문헌 (62)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-517-001194504