메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
문지영 (충북대학교) 황지수 (충북대학교) 손명혜 (충북대학교) 반영운 (충북대학교)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 대한건축학회 2016년도 추계학술발표대회논문집 제36권 제2호(통권 제66집)
발행연도
2016.10
수록면
1,781 - 1,786 (6page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Urban Living Zone Park (ULZP) is an important factor to improve the quality of citizens" life. ULZP supply service provided by government needs to consider not only quantitative supply but also qualitative one including accessibility, maintenance, quality, and equity. Thus, it is necessary to diagnose the service level of supplying the parks and to provide appropriate policies according to the diagnosis. But previous researches have not diagnosed the service level in the comprehensive manner but dealt with mainly quantitative service of supplying ULZPs.
So, this study has intended to develop the indicators to diagnose the service level of supplying the parks comprehensively. These diagnosis indicators were developed through following 4 steps: 1) "developing an indicator pool," 2) "classifying indicators," 3) "extracting final indicators," and 4) "setting priorities of indicators."
As a result, this study has found out 7 types of indicators with 31 sub-indicators. 7 types indicators include "quantity," "availability and accessibility," "quality," "maintenance," "equity," "regional characteristics," and "replacement." Among the types, the types like "availability and accessibility" and "quality" were selected based on their priorities of 0.23 and 0.22 respectively. "The ratio of isolated regions from the park service," "the ratio of utilized regions of the parks" were selected as the representative indicators of "availability and accessibility." Also, "convenient facilities" and "recreation facilities" were selected as the representative indicators of "quality."

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 이론적고찰
3. 지표설정
4. 진단지표 중요도 분석
5. 분석의 종합 및 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-540-002135344