지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第101號
- 발행연도
- 2016.12
- 수록면
- 115 - 135 (21page)
- DOI
- 10.25021/JCLL.2016.12.101.115
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis considered aspects of correspondence in Chinese subject clauses and the Korean language. The details are as follows:
First, relevant solutions were presented, with a focus on the definitions, characteristics, scope of Chinese and Korean subject clauses, the position of the clauses in grammatical units, and others.
Second, it looked at characteristics of the nominalizing endings of Korean subject clauses ‘-(eu)m’ and ‘-gi’ or their dependent noun ‘geot’ as well as predication types of matrix sentences including Korean subject clauses.
Third, by choosing example sentences according to classification of types of predicates of matrix sentences including Chinese subject clauses, it selected a sample of Korean and Chinese people and examined aspects of correspondence in the Korean language. As a result, it could be seen that various correspondence forms exist when Chinese subject clauses are translated into the Korean language. There were cases where forms of Chinese subject clauses were completely consistent with those of Korean ones; when predicates of Chinese matrix sentences realize modals (e.g. auxiliary verbs, requesting and imperative verbs, relative verbs, influential verbs), forms of correspondence in the Korean language were forms of clauses indicating condition, purpose, reason, etc.
Finally, it makes suggests as follow-up studies on Chinese and Korean subject clauses as follows:
1. Consideration of aspects of correspondence in Korean subject clauses against the Chinese language
2. A syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic contrastive analysis of predicates of matrix sentences including Chinese and Korean subject clauses
3. A contrastive analysis of main predicates constituents of Chinese and Korean subject clauses
4. Consideration of selection of the case markers ‘-eun/-neun/-i/-ga’ in terms of forms of translating Chinese subject clauses into the Korean language
5. An analysis of the characteristics of an Chinese and Korean according to the target language level in terms of forms of translating Chinese subject clauses into the Korean language
First, relevant solutions were presented, with a focus on the definitions, characteristics, scope of Chinese and Korean subject clauses, the position of the clauses in grammatical units, and others.
Second, it looked at characteristics of the nominalizing endings of Korean subject clauses ‘-(eu)m’ and ‘-gi’ or their dependent noun ‘geot’ as well as predication types of matrix sentences including Korean subject clauses.
Third, by choosing example sentences according to classification of types of predicates of matrix sentences including Chinese subject clauses, it selected a sample of Korean and Chinese people and examined aspects of correspondence in the Korean language. As a result, it could be seen that various correspondence forms exist when Chinese subject clauses are translated into the Korean language. There were cases where forms of Chinese subject clauses were completely consistent with those of Korean ones; when predicates of Chinese matrix sentences realize modals (e.g. auxiliary verbs, requesting and imperative verbs, relative verbs, influential verbs), forms of correspondence in the Korean language were forms of clauses indicating condition, purpose, reason, etc.
Finally, it makes suggests as follow-up studies on Chinese and Korean subject clauses as follows:
1. Consideration of aspects of correspondence in Korean subject clauses against the Chinese language
2. A syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic contrastive analysis of predicates of matrix sentences including Chinese and Korean subject clauses
3. A contrastive analysis of main predicates constituents of Chinese and Korean subject clauses
4. Consideration of selection of the case markers ‘-eun/-neun/-i/-ga’ in terms of forms of translating Chinese subject clauses into the Korean language
5. An analysis of the characteristics of an Chinese and Korean according to the target language level in terms of forms of translating Chinese subject clauses into the Korean language
목차
1. 들어가며
2. 중·한 주어절의 정의와 특징
3. 한국어 명사형 어미 ‘-(으)ㅁ, -기’, 의존명사 ‘것’
4. 중국어 주어절의 한국어 번역 대응 양상
5. 나가며
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
학교문법의 안은 문장 체계에 대한 비판적 고찰
국어교육연구
2016 .06
-
서술절에 대한 재고찰 - 내포절 체계 내의 다른 절과의 변별을 중심으로 -
한말연구
2017 .01
-
한국 영어학습자들의 because, since, as 이유절 사용에 관한 연구
언어학
2016 .01
-
한국 영어학습자들의 before절과 after절의 문장 내 위치에 대한 분석
언어학 연구
2019 .07
-
'연동문'의 정의와 범주 설정에 대한 소고
중국언어연구
2018 .01
-
unless절의 용법 및 문장 내 분포
언어학 연구
2022 .01
-
통사 단위 ‘절’에 대한 일고찰
동악어문학
2020 .02
-
고대 중국어 내포문 구성에 대한 논의
중국어문학
2018 .01
-
한국어 겹문장 체계에서 서술어의 논항으로 기능하는 절의 문제
언어사실과 관점
2021 .01
-
Locus of difficulty in processing L2 English object relative clauses: A study with Korean university students
언어와언어학
2019 .01
-
대학생 영작문에 나타난 if절의 문장 내 위치 분석
언어학 연구
2020 .04
-
한국어 겹문장 체계의 체계기능언어학적 해석 방법
한말연구
2023 .01
-
자연언어에 나타나는 공백현상에 관한 연구
일어일문학
2018 .02
-
한국 대학생의 영어 절 습득 순서에 대한 연구
Foreign Languages Education
2017 .01
-
한국 영어학습자들의 unless절 사용 분석
언어학 연구
2024 .10
-
영어 미디어에 사용된 영어 관계절 구문에 대한 코퍼스 기반 연구
외국학연구
2017 .01
-
연결어미의 의미 기능과 메타언어 선정에 대하여 - 후행절 제약 양상을 토대로 -
언어사실과 관점
2020 .01
-
영어 when 부사절의 문장 내 위치에 관한 연구
언어학 연구
2016 .10
-
관형절 내포문 한-중 번역을 위한 새 길 탐색
통번역교육연구
2024 .06
-
한국 영어학습자들의 because 사용에 관한 모국어전이 효과
언어학 연구
2016 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-820-002040096