메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Sung-Ae Kim (Pusan National University)
저널정보
한국응용언어학회 응용언어학 응용언어학 제32권 제4호
발행연도
2016.12
수록면
89 - 118 (30page)
DOI
10.17154/kjal.2016.12.32.4.89

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to investigate the characteristics of Korean high school students’ summary writing of the English texts they have read. For that aim the study analyzes the summary writing of 34 high school 2<SUP>nd</SUP> year students who read two English texts with different degrees of difficulty. The analysis focused on the participants’ ability to distinguish between important and trivial ideas, their ability to connect the ideas with or without a connective word, and their strategies used in the summary writing. The result shows that a majority of the participants were able to distinguish between important ideas and trivial ideas in the reading texts. However, more than a few students had difficulty in connecting ideas smoothly. Particularly, the low-ability students had difficulty in achieving a smooth transition between ideas without using a connective word. In addition, the result also shows that the most frequently used strategy was “repetition” and strategies such as “paraphrase” and “transformation” were rarely used, reflecting the students’ currently low writing proficiency. Based on the result, the study concludes that the summary writing ability of Korean high school EFL students is currently quite elementary. Given that summarization is an important reading skill, it is argued that students must be provided with more opportunities to summarize the reading text through summary writing, which will require a long-term, systematic instruction, including instruction regarding the connection of ideas.

목차

Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
Ⅱ. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
Ⅲ. METHOD
Ⅳ. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Ⅴ. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (52)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-701-001872481