지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.11
- 수록면
- 55 - 75 (21page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article examines patent licensing strategies of eco-technology by an innovator. In the presence of emission tax, we consider a model of vertically related market between upstream monopolistic innovator and downstream polluting duopolistic firms where polluting firms may purchase a license of pollution abatement technology from an upstream patentee. When the government imposes an emission tax on downstream polluting industry, we analyze the incentive of an innovator for using two-part tariff licensing strategies.
The main findings of this paper are as follows: First, the innovator always prefers two-part tariff licensing to fixed-fee licensing. Second, the innovator will provide non-exclusion licensing under two-part tariff licensing. Third, two-part tariff licensing can reduce welfare loss which arises in an exclusive licensing strategy under fixed-fee. That is, eco-monopolist improves social welfare with non-exclusion licensing under two-part tariff licensing. Thus, two-part tariff licensing is superior to fixed-fee licensing in some specific tax ranges. Finally, we suggest the optimal policy to improve the welfare with the optimal emission tax under two-part tariff licensing.
The main findings of this paper are as follows: First, the innovator always prefers two-part tariff licensing to fixed-fee licensing. Second, the innovator will provide non-exclusion licensing under two-part tariff licensing. Third, two-part tariff licensing can reduce welfare loss which arises in an exclusive licensing strategy under fixed-fee. That is, eco-monopolist improves social welfare with non-exclusion licensing under two-part tariff licensing. Thus, two-part tariff licensing is superior to fixed-fee licensing in some specific tax ranges. Finally, we suggest the optimal policy to improve the welfare with the optimal emission tax under two-part tariff licensing.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. The Model
3. Analysis of Two-part Tariff Licensing
4. Policy Discussions on Optimal Emission Tax
5. Concluding Remarks
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-323-001239504