지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In 4th Oct. 2007, the Political Leaders of South and North Korea had summit-level conference and published their memorandum. The memorandum will contribute political stabilization of korean peninsula and economic cooperation between South and North Korea. North Korea has enacted the “Law for Economic Cooperation between South and North Korea”, in order to attain close economic cooperation and assistance from South Korea. However the Law has not yet satisfactory outcome, because of some problematic contents in the Law.
Firstly, the Law has no favored treatment on the business of South Korea, whereby korean corporations had no merit doing business in North Korea. Therefore I suggest to promulgate “The Law for the Protection of Korean People doing business in North Korea”.
Secondly, the attaining approval of business from authorities concerned in North Korea is very difficult. Moreover the capital invested in North Korea could not be protected because of legal problems on the ownership of lands and buildings in North Korea. So epoch-making legislations in North Korea to protect the ownership of lands and buildings of korean corporations are necessary.
Thirdly, the corporate governance of joint venture in North Korea has much problems. The decision rule in the board meeting of joint venture is unanimous. Under the unanimous rule, the board of directors of joint venture cannot make out any good programs about the business activities in North Korea, because of any one member blocking the decision unreasonably. The decision rule in north korean joint venture should be changed into majority rule in near future.
Fourthly, under the “Law for Economic Cooperation between South and North Korea, the labours should be employed among residences of North Korea through authorities concerned. And for the dismissal of the labours, joint venture should report and get approval from the labor unions, without consideration of the circumstances surrounding the dismissal of labors. The system of dismissal of labors in North Korea is quite different from that of South Korea. So in North Korea under reasonable conditions, joint venture should dismiss labors without approval of labor unions, as is the case of South Korea.
Firstly, the Law has no favored treatment on the business of South Korea, whereby korean corporations had no merit doing business in North Korea. Therefore I suggest to promulgate “The Law for the Protection of Korean People doing business in North Korea”.
Secondly, the attaining approval of business from authorities concerned in North Korea is very difficult. Moreover the capital invested in North Korea could not be protected because of legal problems on the ownership of lands and buildings in North Korea. So epoch-making legislations in North Korea to protect the ownership of lands and buildings of korean corporations are necessary.
Thirdly, the corporate governance of joint venture in North Korea has much problems. The decision rule in the board meeting of joint venture is unanimous. Under the unanimous rule, the board of directors of joint venture cannot make out any good programs about the business activities in North Korea, because of any one member blocking the decision unreasonably. The decision rule in north korean joint venture should be changed into majority rule in near future.
Fourthly, under the “Law for Economic Cooperation between South and North Korea, the labours should be employed among residences of North Korea through authorities concerned. And for the dismissal of the labours, joint venture should report and get approval from the labor unions, without consideration of the circumstances surrounding the dismissal of labors. The system of dismissal of labors in North Korea is quite different from that of South Korea. So in North Korea under reasonable conditions, joint venture should dismiss labors without approval of labor unions, as is the case of South Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 남북정상회담의 성과
Ⅲ. 「북남경제협력법」의 기본방향
Ⅳ. 「북남경제협력법」의 과제
Ⅴ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
북한 개정합영법의 평가와 전망
한양법학
2007 .08
-
남북경제교류의 현황과 문제점에 따른 개선방안
대한경영학회지
2000 .12
-
남북한 사회통합과 법적 과제
한양법학
2010 .02
-
남북경협과 중소기업의 對북한 진출방안
무역학회지
2001 .01
-
북한 주민의 외부 접촉과 대남 인식 변화
아세아연구
2014 .09
-
남북한 IT협력사업의 개선방안
인터넷전자상거래연구
2007 .12
-
통일준비차원에서 북한주민의 법 인식 교정을 위한 지향점 도출 연구 : 사회주의법 및 북한법의 배경을 중심으로
한양법학
2016 .11
-
남ㆍ북한관세협력에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2001 .02
-
남북한 전자상거래협력사업의 추진방안에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2006 .08
-
The North Korean Economy: Current Situation, Crisis, and Possible Scenarios
Asian International Studies Review
2006 .01
-
Moving from a North Korean Nuclear Problem to the Problem of North Korea
EAI 이슈브리핑
2009 .06
-
North Korea’s South Korea Policy: An Evaluation of Determining Variables and Prospects for 2012
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2011 .01
-
남북경제협력의 국제법적 측면 : 법과 정치
서울국제법연구
2008 .06
-
북한 사회 연구동향과 과제
현대북한연구
2010 .04
-
A Comparative Study of Economic Systems in South Korea and North Korea
아세아연구
1970 .12
-
남북관계의 과제 : 화해와 협력
국제정치연구
2014 .12
-
FTA 시대의 남북경협과 관세법 개정 방안에 대한 연구
관세학회지
2007 .05
-
북한사회의 변화 전망과 대북 정책의 방향
경기연구원 기본연구
2009 .11
-
북한의 경제특구 개발에 대한 소고 : 한국의 마산수출자유지역 개발사례 연구를 통해
국토연구
2003 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
북한 개정합영법의 평가와 전망
안택식
한양법학
2007
.08
[2000년대의 성찰과 새로운 10년의 전망] 남북공조 없이 동북아 주도권 확보 어렵다 - 남북정상회담ㆍ평화협정 체결, 현안으로 등장할 것
정창현
민족21
2011
.04
[1장] 한반도통일 이후를 위한 사회보장정책 방향
김원식
선진화 정책시리즈
2017
.08
제2차 남북정상회담 이후 남북경제협력의 전개에 대한 논의 : 한반도 주변환경 변수와 남한의 국내변수를 중심으로
이성우
21세기정치학회보
2008
.12
남북정상회담에 대한 북중 인식의 고찰 : 제1차 남북정상회담에 대한 로동신문과 인민일보 보도를 중심으로
한관수
공공사회연구
2015
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000706076