지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.12
- 수록면
- 123 - 143 (21page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis focus on the power of final decision of the administrative organ which conducted the reconsideration in Chinese legal system. In current Chinese legal system, the Administrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China, the Administrative Review Law of the People's Republic of China, the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Entry and Exit of Chinese Citizens, and the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Entry and Exit of Foreigners, confirms the power of final decision of the administrative organ which conducted the reconsideration
As a general rule, with regard to specific administrative action of administrative organ, the administrative counterpart can choose between administrative litigation and administrative review. But, in otherwise, as regards administrative fine or administrative detention of public security organization in the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Entry and Exit, and as regards specific administrative action of Department of State Council, People's Government at the provincial level, People's Government of autonomous region or People's Government of municipality directly under the Central Government, for administrative remedy, if the administrative counterpart choose administrative review, the decision of the administrative organ which conducted the reconsideration becomes final award, and the administrative counterpart can not bring a suit against defendant(the administrative organ) any more.
In particularly, the article 30 of the Administrative Review Law of the People's Republic of China exclude judicial review of People's Court, in case of definition or adjustment of administrative boundary, decision of land requisition by State Council, People's Government at the provincial level, People's Government of autonomous region or People's Government of municipality directly under the Central Government, and in case of verifying decision of the administrative organ which regard to the ownership or right to the use of mineral resources, watercourse, forest, chain of mountains, grassland, wasteland, sand area, maritime space by People's Government at the provincial level, People's Government of autonomous region or People's Government of municipality directly under the Central Government.
Confirming the power of final decision of the administrative organ which conducted the reconsideration means that the administrative organ has a power which is conclude judicial review by People's Court. Lastly, in China, these system will threaten sufficient remedy of administrative counterpart, and it would be violate the principle of rule of law.
As a general rule, with regard to specific administrative action of administrative organ, the administrative counterpart can choose between administrative litigation and administrative review. But, in otherwise, as regards administrative fine or administrative detention of public security organization in the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Entry and Exit, and as regards specific administrative action of Department of State Council, People's Government at the provincial level, People's Government of autonomous region or People's Government of municipality directly under the Central Government, for administrative remedy, if the administrative counterpart choose administrative review, the decision of the administrative organ which conducted the reconsideration becomes final award, and the administrative counterpart can not bring a suit against defendant(the administrative organ) any more.
In particularly, the article 30 of the Administrative Review Law of the People's Republic of China exclude judicial review of People's Court, in case of definition or adjustment of administrative boundary, decision of land requisition by State Council, People's Government at the provincial level, People's Government of autonomous region or People's Government of municipality directly under the Central Government, and in case of verifying decision of the administrative organ which regard to the ownership or right to the use of mineral resources, watercourse, forest, chain of mountains, grassland, wasteland, sand area, maritime space by People's Government at the provincial level, People's Government of autonomous region or People's Government of municipality directly under the Central Government.
Confirming the power of final decision of the administrative organ which conducted the reconsideration means that the administrative organ has a power which is conclude judicial review by People's Court. Lastly, in China, these system will threaten sufficient remedy of administrative counterpart, and it would be violate the principle of rule of law.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 행정심판기관의 종국재결권의 근거
Ⅲ. 행정심판의 관할과 종국재결권 행사의 주체
Ⅳ. 종국재결권의 인정에 관한 법리
Ⅴ. 종국재결권의 인정에 대한 평가
Ⅵ. 결어
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
國際聯合行政上의 諸問題
국제법학회논총
1960 .04
-
中国2014年《行政诉讼法》修正案的主要内容及未来发展
동북아법연구
2015 .01
-
동아시아 행정심판제도 비교연구
행정법연구
2008 .08
-
행정지도와 법률유보 및 구제에 관한 이론적 검토
한양법학
2011 .08
-
中国行政监察制度的历史演变和未来发展
지방자치법연구
2014 .01
-
글로벌 시대의 公益論
행정법연구
2007 .12
-
행정의 행위형식으로서의‘행정계획’개념에 대한 검토－헌법재판소 2000. 6. 1. 선고, 99헌마538등 결정,대법원 1982. 3. 9. 선고, 80누105 판결 및 대법원 2002.10. 11. 선고, 2000두8226 판결에 대한 평석－
일감법학
2013 .01
-
한국의 행정계획
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2007 .12
-
東アジアにおける比較行政法の可能性
동북아법연구
2012 .01
-
프랑스, 미국에서의 행정행위 개념에 대한 소고
행정법연구
2007 .12
-
현대의 행정 변화와 행정법학 방법론 연구 : 전통적 행정법학의 방법론 분석과 그 보완을 위한 시론(試論)
행정법연구
2005 .10
-
중국행정소송에서 검찰기관(检察机关)의 소제기에 관한 연구
동북아법연구
2013 .01
-
행정질서벌에 대한 再考
원광법학
2009 .01
-
중국 행정허가법의 내용과 평가
공법학연구
2004 .12
-
行政機關의 개념과 종류 : 行政組織法의 기초개념 재검토
행정법연구
2013 .11
-
2018년 행정법(I) 중요판례평석
인권과 정의
2019 .01
-
행정계획론 소고
법학연구
2007 .06
-
2017년 행정법(I) 중요 판례
인권과 정의
2018 .01
-
행정법학의 개념과그 외연(外延) : 제도중심의 공법학방법론을 위한 시론(試論)
행정법연구
2008 .08
-
2019년 행정법(I) 중요판례평석
인권과 정의
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-019482326