지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Administrative Guidance is actual cooperation request action without any binding force, and realized by the voluntary cooperation of the other party. So It is not permitted for the administrative agency to enforce the content of administrative guidance through the exercise of public authority power. And, it cannot deprive the other party's discretion. However, most administrative guidances are executed on the basis of administrative dignity or authority, and the people are to obey those guidances regardless of their will, and so sometimes the guidances impinge upon he rights and interests of the citizens with practical compulsory power exceeding the ordinary limits. If the administrative Guidances should not be allowed this much, there is the need to consider what administrative guidances are allowed and what would be the relief method for the rights and interests of the citizens against the violation of administrative guidances. This thesis is focused on the consideration of the State Compensation as one of the relief method.
First, the Administrative Guidance could be considered as an exercise of government authority because the span of government authority includes all the activities excluding private economy functions and equipment and management functions managed by the State Compensation Act Article 2 among the functions of state and public organization according to the majority opinions and cases. Secondly, the majority opinions and cases show that the reservation of law is allowed to the administrative guidance under the condition that the concerned contents do not violate the legal regulation and take the practical compulsion. At last, the question is whether the administrative guidance takes the compulsion and what conditions count for the compulsory situation to decide the state compensation. Regarding this, not only the other party's state of mind considered in the case of development amount return based on a 'Manual for Guidance', but also the consolidated state of affairs such as 'clauses in the Manual and operational practices' are to be the criteria of decision. In certain circumstances, the fact whether the other party exercises his/her will not to accept an administrative guidance clearly is considered as an important factor in the decision of arbitrary administrative guidance.
Henceforward, just like Korea, there must be enough review on the other party's cooperation and requisites of discretion based on the sorts of administrative guidances in Japan, and to make those decisive criteria clear is precondition for the review of administrative guidance. In addition, various reviews of definite cases should be essential because the illegality on the other party's discretion issue should decided upon the remarkable irrationality reflecting not only the purpose and object of the applicable acts but also various factors such as general principles of common law and administrative law.
First, the Administrative Guidance could be considered as an exercise of government authority because the span of government authority includes all the activities excluding private economy functions and equipment and management functions managed by the State Compensation Act Article 2 among the functions of state and public organization according to the majority opinions and cases. Secondly, the majority opinions and cases show that the reservation of law is allowed to the administrative guidance under the condition that the concerned contents do not violate the legal regulation and take the practical compulsion. At last, the question is whether the administrative guidance takes the compulsion and what conditions count for the compulsory situation to decide the state compensation. Regarding this, not only the other party's state of mind considered in the case of development amount return based on a 'Manual for Guidance', but also the consolidated state of affairs such as 'clauses in the Manual and operational practices' are to be the criteria of decision. In certain circumstances, the fact whether the other party exercises his/her will not to accept an administrative guidance clearly is considered as an important factor in the decision of arbitrary administrative guidance.
Henceforward, just like Korea, there must be enough review on the other party's cooperation and requisites of discretion based on the sorts of administrative guidances in Japan, and to make those decisive criteria clear is precondition for the review of administrative guidance. In addition, various reviews of definite cases should be essential because the illegality on the other party's discretion issue should decided upon the remarkable irrationality reflecting not only the purpose and object of the applicable acts but also various factors such as general principles of common law and administrative law.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 행정지도와 공권력 행사
Ⅲ. 행정지도와 위법성
Ⅳ. 행정지도의 부작위와 국가배상
Ⅴ. 논의의 정리 및 과제
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
행정지도와 법률유보 및 구제에 관한 이론적 검토
한양법학
2011 .08
-
國際聯合行政上의 諸問題
국제법학회논총
1960 .04
-
행정지도와 공정거래법의 적용제외 및 부당한 공동행위의 성립요건
경영법률
2005 .01
-
行政節次法上 行政指導와 問題點 改善方案
법학연구
2007 .11
-
행정지도에 관한 연구
한국자치행정학보
2008 .01
-
행정지도가 개입된 부당한 공동행위 관련 판례평석(判例評釋) (서울고법 2011. 6. 2. 선고 2010누21718판결)
法學論文集
2011 .01
-
컴퓨터 프로그램 보호를 위한 행정지도 방안
행정법연구
2002 .08
-
일선 지방행정에서의 행정지도(行政指導)의 실태 및 개선방안 고찰
규제연구
2014 .12
-
행정지도의 개념과 실제 : 공정거래법상 부당한 공동행위와의 관계를 중심으로
행정법연구
2014 .02
-
일본에서의 국가배상법상의 행정지도 부작위 위법책임에 관한 소고
법학연구
2013 .08
-
동아시아 행정심판제도 비교연구
행정법연구
2008 .08
-
프랑스, 미국에서의 행정행위 개념에 대한 소고
행정법연구
2007 .12
-
한국의 행정계획
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2007 .12
-
행정의 행위형식으로서의‘행정계획’개념에 대한 검토－헌법재판소 2000. 6. 1. 선고, 99헌마538등 결정,대법원 1982. 3. 9. 선고, 80누105 판결 및 대법원 2002.10. 11. 선고, 2000두8226 판결에 대한 평석－
일감법학
2013 .01
-
실용적 첨단유도법칙 개발을 위한 고려사항
한국군사과학기술학회지
2002 .01
-
민간법인에 대한 정부규제의 사례연구
공공사회연구
2019 .05
-
中国2014年《行政诉讼法》修正案的主要内容及未来发展
동북아법연구
2015 .01
-
東アジアにおける比較行政法の可能性
동북아법연구
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0