지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The 21st century is transforming itself from the age of "Centralization and Concentration" into the age of "Decentralization". The contemporary paradigm is shifted from the age of "State and Efficiency" into the age of "Balanced Development". Among many countries which try to meet the great changes of our times, especially Japan is driving forward the decentralization and decentralization policy to improve the national competitiveness.
For the purpose of nation's balanced development, and to remedy the ill effect of centralization, discussions on decentralization steadily took place in Korea. The Participatory Government, which promised decentralization policy as its presidential campaign pledge, designated decentralization and nation's balanced development as its core tasks and pushing them forward, To realize "Decentralization" and "Nation's Balanced Development" the Participatory Government set up the Government Innovation Decentralization Committee under the immediate control of the government and announced "the Participatory Government Decentralization Promotion Road Map". On the basis of this Road Map, the government enacted the so-called "Three Special Laws for Decentralization", namely the Decentralization Special Law, Nation's Balanced Development Special Law and Special Measure Law For the Construction Of New Administrative Capital. However, in reality, the government is confronting political, social and legal conflicts and disputes in relation to the methods, the time and the applicable region to drive forward the decentralization policy and to bring an end to the centralized system.
The Three Special Laws for Decentralization emphasize that the centralization of national powers, lack of local autonomy experience, lack of capacity for autonomy, insufficient citizen participation and poor local finance impedes the development into the decentralized developed nation and also that the centralized system in the age of compressional economic growth is not functioning efficiently anymore and hinders the national competitiveness instead. The Three Laws have its origin in the recognition above and are intended to promote increased local vitality by citizen participation and reinforced national competitiveness through answering to the needs for decentralization.
In the contemporary Korean society take place heated discussions over the decentralization and the construction of new administrative capital. The government party and the opposition party argue over the national referendum for the relocation of the administrative capital. In this essay will be reviewed the basic ideas of decentralization and contents and problems of decentralization special laws. The future tasks in pushing forward the decentralization policy under the Decentralization Special Law will also be presented.
For the purpose of nation's balanced development, and to remedy the ill effect of centralization, discussions on decentralization steadily took place in Korea. The Participatory Government, which promised decentralization policy as its presidential campaign pledge, designated decentralization and nation's balanced development as its core tasks and pushing them forward, To realize "Decentralization" and "Nation's Balanced Development" the Participatory Government set up the Government Innovation Decentralization Committee under the immediate control of the government and announced "the Participatory Government Decentralization Promotion Road Map". On the basis of this Road Map, the government enacted the so-called "Three Special Laws for Decentralization", namely the Decentralization Special Law, Nation's Balanced Development Special Law and Special Measure Law For the Construction Of New Administrative Capital. However, in reality, the government is confronting political, social and legal conflicts and disputes in relation to the methods, the time and the applicable region to drive forward the decentralization policy and to bring an end to the centralized system.
The Three Special Laws for Decentralization emphasize that the centralization of national powers, lack of local autonomy experience, lack of capacity for autonomy, insufficient citizen participation and poor local finance impedes the development into the decentralized developed nation and also that the centralized system in the age of compressional economic growth is not functioning efficiently anymore and hinders the national competitiveness instead. The Three Laws have its origin in the recognition above and are intended to promote increased local vitality by citizen participation and reinforced national competitiveness through answering to the needs for decentralization.
In the contemporary Korean society take place heated discussions over the decentralization and the construction of new administrative capital. The government party and the opposition party argue over the national referendum for the relocation of the administrative capital. In this essay will be reviewed the basic ideas of decentralization and contents and problems of decentralization special laws. The future tasks in pushing forward the decentralization policy under the Decentralization Special Law will also be presented.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 지방분권의 기본이념과 필요성
Ⅲ. 분권특별법의 주요내용 및 문제점
Ⅳ. 참여정부의 지방분권정책상의 향후 과제
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (36)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지방분권 개혁의 단계별 제도적 이슈
한국사회와 행정연구
2004 .05
-
Decentralization Policies in Korea : Problems and Tasks
한국비교정부학보
2007 .01
-
참여정부의 지방분권정책 평가 : 지방공무원의 인식조사를 중심으로
한국지역개발학회지
2005 .12
-
지방분권특별법 및 국가균형발전특별법에 대한 비판적 검토
법과 정책연구
2004 .06
-
이명박 정부하의 지방분권정책 : 추진과제, 체제 및 전략을 중심으로
한국지방정부학회 학술대회자료집
2008 .09
-
지방자치단체간 분권연대의 필요성과 가능성 : 대상사업을 중심으로
경기논단
2005 .03
-
이탈리아의 지방분권 및 시사점
경기논단
2004 .09
-
동북아 자치단체 국제교류
한국지방정부학회 학술대회자료집
2008 .09
-
참여정부의 지방분권 추진계획(분권 로드맵)의 평가
지방정부연구
2003 .08
-
지방분권에 대한 주민인식의 지역별 격차 분석 : 영남지역을 중심으로
21세기정치학회보
2018 .06
-
일본 지방분권일괄법의 제정 경위와 추진 성과
지방자치법연구
2017 .01
-
참여정부의 행정분권법제에 대한 평가- 地方自治의 理念과 地方分權 -
지방자치법연구
2005 .01
-
일본의 지방분권개혁
지방자치법연구
2010 .01
-
Decentralization Policies in Korea : Problems and Tasks
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2007 .12
-
아프리카 지방분권화에 대한 고찰
Asian Journal of African Studies
2010 .08
-
Did Local Governments Really Become More Efficient after Decentralization?
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2003 .10
-
지방분권 수준 측정을 위한 지방분권 지표의 개발과 적용
지방정부연구
2006 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-362-016080973